Press Releases

Maybe that story will go live also. Now in this case, the witness was a chairman of a major political party. Last night when he won my only thought was, here he comes the hero. The deepest truth is that universal humanism and ethical culture is foreign to Judaic thinking that is tribal and legalistic. Find more about Michigan at Wikipedia's sister projects.

Licensing ›

Local Casino Finder

Most sites should be available to players sometime in the very near future. Online gambling has grown quite a lot since that time. In , according to a Topline Findings report, 23 million Americans played poker regularly, and 15 million of them played online for real money. Of those, 7 million of them played online poker for real money at least once per month.

The numbers have fallen in the past few years. The same pertains to online casino winnings, no matter where the Internet gambling company is based. Players can often deduct losses to offset the amount of tax owed, but a tax specialist should help with that decision.

In addition, state taxes vary in America, so someone familiar with the state in question should address the issues of state gambling taxes. Most international online casinos and poker sites operate in United States dollars because it is a globally recognized currency. Players can deposit and withdraw in dollars from any online gaming site, and they can play in that currency as well, viewing their cashier page and all financial transactions in United States dollars. You can easily see the legal ages organized by jurisdiction and state in this table.

The age limit to gamble in online casinos corresponds to the age limit for brick and mortar casinos, i. Players can check the trustworthiness of a company by checking the gaming license and looking for symbols from oversight organizations like eCOGRA, which indicates regular audits of the company. Players should be cautious when signing up to play on any online casino for real money. Players in the United States concerned about funds on an international online casino or poker site should look for proper licensing and a symbol from eCOGRA.

That symbol represents the approval of the international oversight organization that conducts regular audits and ensures that the site is operating fairly and ensuring the safety and security of players.

Most online casinos that cater to American players use random number generators to ensure fair play. They also use encryption software to make sure that all player information is secure within the site. Players should verify that these are used, as most sites will display that information or make it available through their customer service representatives.

Players can always report a site or players on a site to the company that holds the online casino license. Americans don't have recourse with the government because of its refusal to regulate as of yet, but the licensing institution, along with any oversight organization like eCOGRA, will be responsible and look into any concerns about unfair activity.

Kentucky is going all out for a sports betting bill in amid a nationwide push for sports betting While other casinos in The online casinos we are introducing to you on this site offer many different payment options. However, many Americans may find it difficult to use their credit cards or e-wallets like PayPal for paying on international online casino sites. You may have to check on the pages of the casino online of your choice, but generally US players can use the following deposit methods in online casinos:.

With regard to cashing out your winnings, you need to check with the internet casino you want to use which method is best for US players. Parimutuel betting is a type of wagering where the final payout is determined after all bets are made. That differs from fixed odds betting where you know the payout when you place your bet. Perimutuel betting is popular form of gambling in a lot of US states.

You'll often find parimutuel betting at off-track facilities. These are places where you can bet on an event without actually being physically present at the location where the event is unfolding. When you bet on horses, you're taking part in parimutuel betting. All bets are pooled together and the house takes its fee.

Once betting closes, the payouts on the outcome are finalized based on how much money is in the pool and the results of the event. With parimutuel betting and horserace betting in particular you'll see odds posted for each wager.

But the odds are indicative of the popularity of the horse relative to others. From church bingo nights, to office betting pools during March Madness, to charity Texas Hold 'Em tournaments at the local VFW chapter, gambling and American culture are incredibly intertwined. So much so that many gambling expressions and phrases are now common household expressions, such as wildcard, up the ante, poker face, and many others. These things probably don't surprise you if you've spent any time at all in the U.

No matter where you are, you don't have to drive far to see a billboard advertising the local state's lottery or an ad for a nearby casino. There is still pressure to restore the hunt but right now their focus is on the status of the heard. Radomski presents his research as "Personal observations on the management of the Mille Lacs walleye fishery.

Radomski's August 25, report tries to answer two questions: What aspects of Mille Lacs fisheries management need improvement? What factors were important in the reduction of the walleye population? The Mille Lacs fisheries management goal of protecting large walleye has suppressed young walleye survival and reduced walleye productivity. The current Mille Lacs walleye spawning stock biomass is plentiful and the population can produce ample walleye eggs and very large numbers of young walleye.

The walleye populations has not collapsed, weakened, or failed; however, the management system has struggled. Suggestions are provided on how to improve the system. This assumption is incorrect. It could be more pragmatic on the difficulties of estimating the number of walleye in the lake with enough accuracy for a hard-edged quota. Star Tribune report includes evidence that the public wasn't supposed to find out about the walleye harvest agreement. Hopefully, he will learn more because the DNR is expected to be "on the hot seat to re-explain its management strategy of the famed Mille Lacs walleye fishery," according to a report in the Star Tribune.

The DNR is accused of hiding "details of a key walleye agreement made this spring with eight Chippewa bands that co-manage the lake. Mille Lacs area residents believe walleye stocks have recovered, based on "phenomenal catch rates. Elected leadership including Rep. Legislators have met with Erickson, and Sen. Oslin said the county will present data to show economic losses related to stringent walleye quotas. Oslin and Erickson agree with Mille Lacs anglers who don't believe the DNR's rigid position that there's a walleye crisis.

Oslin said, "A growing core of stakeholders around Mille Lacs believes co-management of the fishery with the Chippewa is't working and should be challenged," according to the report.

Co-management protocols stemming from a federal court order "can be changed and the state should flex its muscles. The agency brought up points of the agreement, "but the document itself wasn't distributed until Erickson uncovered it," the report stated. Secrecy appears to have been deliberate, since the signed agreement's masthead included the statement: Pereira was also quoted, saying, "It's a constant frustration to manage the Mille Lacs fishery while having "to exert so much energy managing human dimensions.

Getting past the secrecy and respecting the volunteer efforts of the Mille Lacs Fishery Advisory Committee would have saved a lot of that energy.

Since you have declined to have a public meeting to discuss this situation, I will respond to both of the e-mails at one time. In Katie's e-mail, she included a copy of a document , which she states was the final agreement. This document does not contain the opening paragraph, which restricted disclosure to the public. Upon reviewing that document copies of both documents attached , I have several questions.

First, if you place page 4 of that document alongside page 4 of the original restricted document, the signatures and dates when they were signed look strikingly similar, and in fact, they look identical to the naked eye. I do not think if you gave me one hundred tries to sign my name twice, any two of my signatures would look that similar.

Also, why if both documents were available on March 31, when they were signed by Don Pereira, was the draft agreement signed along with the supposed final agreement? In the same way, why would the other three parties who signed the agreement seven to twelve days later sign the draft? It would seem reasonable that all of the parties would only sign the final agreement.

Both you and Katie make a point that the lack of disclosure to MLFAC and the public was an oversight and it was not intentionally withheld. I find it surprising that in all of the discussions since March 31, about harvestable surplus, regulations, closures, conservation caps, etc.

You both also state that the substance of the agreement was discussed with MLFAC members last spring. I certainly agree that we discussed the overage and its payback, as well as, safe harvest limits and allocation.

It was also never disclosed to us that you had agreed upon parameters for calculating harvestable surplus levels for based on spawning stock biomass levels, nor that you had agreed to be locked in to the latest hooking mortality study, which we have many problems with, as outlined in our latest recommendations to you.

In your e-mail, you also outline the problems created by the State's overage in It was not allowed by your agreement with the Bands. My question then would be; was the Governor made aware of the potential consequences of his decision by either the DNR or the Attorney General's office prior to its announcement? It would seem that this information would be critical to his decision.

If he were aware of the consequences, why would he proceed? If not, why was he not given this information? It ha d some very negative consequences for the citizens of Minnesota. I have also listened for years to you and other DNR employees say we have no chance if the State went back to court.

We cannot win so we should give the Bands whatever they want. I am curious what basis you have for this conclusion. To the best of my knowledge, neither you nor Governor Dayton are attorneys so I assume this conclusion comes from Attorney General Swanson. Have any independent parties ever reviewed these conclusions? There are several national law firms who deal with Native American treaties and rights on a daily basis and are current with the latest court decisions.

Would the citizens of Minnesota benefit from having one of these law firms review the State's legal position and options?

In conclusion, there remain many questions about this entire situation, and I still believe an open meeting for MLFAC members and other interested parties would be beneficial. Anglers have endured an extended ban on walleye fishing interspersed with catch-and-release restrictions this summer, due to what critics view as mismanagement of the resource by the Dayton administration.

Now the co-chair of the Mille Lacs Fishery Advisory Committee has accused the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and Dayton of cutting a secret deal with the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibway and other tribes on the walleye harvest for the next three years. The agreement was finalized in March, but only recently came to light. This agreement was never disclosed to the public at any time.

Why would the DNR secretly negotiate a settlement like this without disclosing it to anyone? Hanson criticizes several aspects of the deal, including a "boost to treaty harvest quotas" that he says "could severely reduce our potential harvest in the future.

A powerful conservation group , Proper Economic Resource Management, also ripped Dayton and the DNR for a lack of transparency and paying lip-service to local businesses and residents who depend on the fishery. It ignores the constituencies MLFAC represents and the suggestions they have been making for improving the 'co-management of Mille Lacs. If an agreement like this has to be done behind closed doors, and the results known only if leaked, is ther more going on than meets the eye?

Steve Johnson found it "disturbing" that the DNR would meet with tribal leaders, and never let on for months. Loss of trust brings an obvious question: Was this really the first time? After being exposed, the DNR is claiming the secret agreement is actually a "public document. Almost as disturbing is the media's near total blackout on reporting the incident. The lack of transparency, and lack of any calls for transparency, only covers the DNR's backside and leaves Minnesotans out in the cold.

Feelings of helplessness and "this will never end" can by offset a bit by sharing these videos. Steve John today released a second video covering 20 years of history of "how we got here" regarding the "co-management" debacle at Mille Lacs. August 29, Otter Tail County commissioners last week voted to request a full environmental impact statement EIS for a proposed casino on Star Lake in response to concerns of local residents.

The project includes a gambling facility, hotel, restaurants, conference center and RV park. Federal law gives the band the right to build a casino on trust land set aside during treaty settlements long ago, but the county has the power to approve other aspects of the project. Only about 15 acres of the proposed acres are Indian Trust land. Local residents are worried what this casino would do to the ecosystem surrounding the lake, a very environmentally sensitive area.

They are worried run-off from the casino will be detrimental to the lakes and wetlands. Too much human pressure on a fragile ecosystem, especially long-term, could be impossible to reverse.

The casino proposal involves the federal, state and county governments as well as a sovereign tribal nation.

An application for a dredging and filling permit on the trust lands is pending with the Army Corps of Engineers.

After the county sets the scope of the EIS and gets responses from the tribe, the board will have a maximum of days to make a decision on its portion of the project. The funds come from the U. Fish and Wildlife Service, which offers support for a range of species and habitats across the country. It will support endangered species and habitats listed in approved state wildlife action plans.

It is very troubling to say the least. We recently acquired a copy of an agreement called "Consensus: We were shocked to say the least. This is exactly the type of thing, which reinforces our position that more transparency is needed in connection with DNR and Band discussions and negotiations. It is an example of why we have requested participation of some kind in FTC meetings. We also need to consider that this agreement resulted from an overharvest of 6, pounds in It was an estimated hooking mortality, not an actual harvest.

These numbers come from expansions of creel census data, which have always been suspect to us, as well as an estimated hooking mortality study, which we have questioned since its release.

We also believe that this overage may well be within the margin of error of all of these calculations, as well.

In addition, the DNR has stated several times that they do not believe that any harm was done to the spawning stock biomass, the year class or any part of the walleye population as a result of the overage.

So why, given the insignificant overage and its minimal impact, did the DNR give up so much? They set harvestable surplus levels, which could severely reduce our potential harvest in the future. They locked us in to a hooking mortality based on the suspect hooking mortality study. They locked us in to an overage program which all comes due in and will probably significantly reduce our harvest potential in At this point, what did you have to lose by letting them go back to court and fighting it?

Maybe a Phase II lawsuit would settle the allocation issues with a more favorable outcome for Minnesota sportsmen. Please respond to this as soon as possible. DNR's Agreement with the Tribes. The agreement was negotiated entirely in secret. It ignores the constituencies MLFAC represents and the suggestions they have been making for improving the "co-management" of Mille Lacs.

It must be infuriating to find out that Mille Lacs "co-management" regarding walleye angling has been hard-wired--for the next three years! Especially galling is having an agreement based on research methods and data challenged as faulty by MLFAC members at every meeting. The agreement leads one to believe all the meetings with Governor Dayton and DNR officials have been nothing more than dog-and-pony shows.

If an agreement like this has to be done behind closed doors, and the results known only if leaked, is there more going on than meets the eye? At a minimum it look like a one-sided sweetheart deal of a payoff, extracted over a measly 6,pound overage. They should be exposed for breaking trust with the citizens of Minnesota, and violating the spirit of the Supreme Court's affirmation of Treaty harvest rights.

Monday morning, August 14, driving up the west side of Mille Lacs Lake, I saw only a handful of boats, even on such a beautiful day. The hour and a half meeting touched on a variety of issues. We had a straightforward conversation that was pointed at times. One highlight was a hearing on how hard it is to run a business without a plan. Can you imagine a Mille Lacs resort customer calling in January to book a summer stay, and having to ask if they can fish while on vacation!

The DNR-Tribal regulations are usually announced only a month or so before opener. These days pre-opener regs can be fleeting, since a mythical number called "hooking mortality," a term invented by the DNR-Tribal co-management team, drives the regs. We also touched on the number and location of DNR test nets, inaccurate creel surveys and boat counts, DNR refusal or inability to answer questions and concerns brought by MLFAC members, and the State not standing up for non-tribal interests and anglers.

When confronted with the debacle of The consensus of resorters was "good, lets go back to court, only this time use all documents and input. Resorters thought he had plenty, suggesting for example, expansion of statewide gambling.

The possibility of even a few machines in each resort would provide all the leverage he needs. I also had the opportunity to present the Governor with thousands of petitions collected by PERM to follow through on his campaign pledge: I also told them both "grow a pair" and tell the tribes they are in charge of all Minnesota's natural resources!

Since co-management was implemented bag limits have gone from 6 walleye to zero. Over 50 businesses have gone under. And those still open are surviving day to day. Given that Governor Dayton believes "all hunting and fishing in Minnesota should be done under the same rules," PERM's petition asked for the following:.

We the undersigned users of Minnesota's natural resources petition the Minnesota Governor, Attorney General, DNR Commissioner, and Legislature to protect the interests of all sportsmen and women, and Minnesota's economic future by:.

Congratulations to the winners! And many thanks to all who entered the raffle. Your support is critical to PERM's success. That would have been quite an accomplishment, given that PERM was not formed until after ordinary business owners, residents, conservation groups clubs , and concerned citizens discovered the "settlement" and testified before the Legislature to defeat his agreement.

Sando likes to blame others for losing on a really bad deal. Sando made the settlement with Mille Lacs Band only, when seven other tribes also signed the Treaty. Had the state of Minnesota agreed to this deal, a Federal Court very quickly would have multiplied the payout seven times over! The Settlement included a 6,acre exclusive Mille Lacs Chippewa treaty fishing zone border to be enforced by State of Minnesota. How many more acres would have been added if the other seven tribes asked the courts for equal treatment?

Recognition of a long-since-disestablished 61,acre reservation, the boundaries of which would have put the communities of Isle, Wahkon, and most of Onamia, plus many landowners and businesses under tribal jurisdiction. The State would convey another 7, acres of land to the Mille Lacs Tribe, for which the State had to "acquire and present clear title. Fish harvest would have begun spring of in the 6,acre exclusive zone, and throughout all of Mille Lacs Lake, by tribal members outside of any State laws.

These are some of the realities of this "good deal. Take the time to read all 49 pages and you will discover other issues. In the end it still failed. Mainstream media ignored the troubling details of this mega-payout. Instead, they chose to brand Coach Bud Grant and those opposed to the settlement as RACIST for supporting the common folk, even though this document was the focal point of the legislative hearings.

After the settlement was defeated at the Legislature, landowners and affected counties were allowed in the lawsuit. It was at this point that PERM was formed to raise money and educate the public. By Sando's own admission in his editorial, his Minnesota DNR--at that time--recommended businesses that depend heavily on fishing should diversify. Did they know even then how much gillnetting during the spawn would affect walleye populations in this premier walleye destination?

I challenge the mainstream press to find jut one reporter to do a full and in-depth story on how we got to the point we re at now. Also look at the Treaty itself, which references a revocation of temporary hunting and fishing privileges. Find documents at perm. It was a spontaneous reaction to DNR co-management's over-reach.

PERM did however promote it because so many concerned, frustrated citizens were willing to put their boats on the water for a cause. Look at all the media coverage the Boat Rally got, reaching you in Oregon, a fish and wildlife resarcher in Alaska, and even being reported in the Wall Street Journal. Dayton will be fishing on a Fisher's Resort launch boat on July 8th. Please join us in a show of support for Lake Mills Lacs walleye. Head up early, have breakfast at an area resort or restaurant, show your support, do a little fishing, and have a meal locally before leaving.

This an attempt to show the Governor and his media there is support, please join us and be respectful! Over 50 Small Business have vanished from the lake; many more struggle to survive. The Governor's Launch will depart from Fisher's Resort at 9 am. Let's send a loud and clear peaceful message to the Governor from the water!

Remember to be respectful of other fishermen. DNR relies on little more than guesswork to set regs 'Co-management' solutions only look at half the equation The issues on Mille Lacs persist! Last year, before going into the "co-management" technical meetings, the DNR admitted they didn't know how many walleye were in Mille Lacs. But there were no proposals coming from Gov. People who take the pulse of the lake daily have a much better picture of the state of the lake!

So I am asking you to use the link at perm. Ask him to take action immediately and do away with "co management. Of course the tribes may sue. But maybe that's exactly what's needed. He is ultimately responsible for protecting natural resources for ALL Minnesotans.

The United States, in turn, guaranteed to the Indians certain hunting, fishing, and gathering rights on the ceded land "during the pleasure of the President of the United States. The petition's creator, Jon Knudsen, a launch boat captain at Nitti's Hunters Point Resort, is advocating for President Trump to curb the Treaty's harvest privileges in the ceded territory. It states that the harvest privilege "is guaranteed to the Indians, during the pleasure of the President of the United States.

The petition has the blessing of PERM, which has long been involved in the issues of fisheries management on Mille Lacs. Knudsen, who is not a member of PERM, said he appreciates what the group has done.

Please click 'We the People' link below, then sign when prompted by the White House website. There will be an e-mail sent and you will have to click on their confirmation link to be counted.

Petition We the people ask the federal government to Change an existing Administration policy:. Remedy to eliminate bilateral control of Mille Lacs Lake, MN to save the walleye population of the lake. Because of closed season netting by Sovereign Ojibwe and MN DNR regulations, the tourism and angler's right to fish are being denied the region that is dependent on tourist dollars to survive.

All administrative remedies have been exhausted. The region is losing it's appeal to fishermen that can only shake their heads at the inconclusive measures that so-called "treaty" management has done to this premier walleye destination.

The Sovereign Nation of Ojibwe claims it has the "right" to decimate the lake to take as many fish as it can take and dictate how many fish everyone else can have.

This is beyond their "sovereign" discretion. We aren't allowed to take any fish as a result. There is a plentiful population of walleye in the lake, yet they would deny anglers the right to fish. I reminded DNR Fisheries chief Don Pereira about a comment he made after attending the Technical Committee meeting with the tribes which he attended having no idea about the number of walleyes in the lake.

He said this year's DNR management and quotas would be about the political more than the biological. Many experts are saying we need to get more of the large walleyes out of the lake.

They are eating machines with poorer fertility. Removing some would actually protect stock levels. At some point the DNR has to realize they are the ultimate authority and still in charge of Mille Lacs' conservation. Anderson's article is worth reviewing since it covers the experience of resorters.

Anglers, citizens concerned about Mille Lacs encouraged to attend Advisory Committee meeting. DNR staff will provide updates on the fishery, including upcoming research projects and preliminary findings from last year's experimental stocking.

The committee will also be discussing its future activities. Please attend and feel free to speak up during the "public comments and question" period at the end of the meeting. The DNR needs to know we are paying attention and want to keep politics out of co-management. Band's walleye take a lesson in conservation Fond du Lac Band has tough year for walleye in Treaty lakes. Makes up for it in Treaty lakes, especially Mille Lacs.

A story in Outdoor News today, May 12, , shows that Mother Nature often creates tough odds for survival. The Fond du Lac Band was reminded of this again this spring. Many factors can affect survival.

Aspects of water quality including dissolved oxygen, temperature, and pH have been known to affect walleye egg survival. Egg adhesiveness can remain for a little as one to two hours. High wind speeds from the wrong direction or at critical times can transport eggs and move substrates and "should be considered a critical factor in annual walleye egg survival and year-class strength.

The odds for survival are long enough. Why would any fishery management add to that by allowing gillnetting during the walleye spawn? They must follow the laws that all other Americans have to follow. PERM continues to promote equal hunting and fishing rights for all!

Brian Borkholder, inland fisheries biologist for Fond du Lac Resource Management blamed the weather for the poor lakes take. The Fond du Lac Band harvests game and fish in northeast Minnesota under treaty rights in the ceded territory.

Those rights were upheld in U. District Court by Judge Richard Kyle in That ruling prevents the state from regulating band harvest. An April 25th video shows spearers working the shoreline during the walleye spawn. This type of action is playing over and over on Mille Lacs. It shows the disruption of the spawning process.

It even shows an example of how spearing has its own "spearing mortality. Tom Wolak, from Foley, has it right when he writes "I can't believe [the DNR] still adheres to the idea that there is no correlation between spring tribal netting and the decline in walleye numbers. So not only do we lose the fertile females and their mates, but the netters and spearers are disturbing the process and huge amounts of eggs are scattered without being fertilized!

See his letter below. They claim by closing the lake to allowing fishermen to keep some walleyes they are somehow helping preserve the spawning class of fish. How many of those spawning class are gonna be taken in Native American nets before they can spawn? The spring netting needs to stop. Compensate the tribes for not netting and allow the lake to return to how it used to be, naturally. The most restrictive regulations, even after summer and winter fishing seasons that clearly proved the lake is full of walleye of all sizes.

After stating that we need a record-low harvest of walleyes because the lake is in "crisis" with only one year-class of small walleyes present in any numbers, DNR Fisheries Chief Don Pereira then states that one reason for the historic restrictions is that fisherman caught much higher numbers of walleye in all sizes than the DNR expected. The frustrating part is that the DNR had determined a much higher harvest allotment this year than the DNR's "partners" in managing the lake would agree to.

These so-called partners get to take fish by net, spear, and hook and line without the same restrictions as the rest of us. My biggest concern is for the hard-working, tax paying business men and women on and around Lake Mille Lacs who will go under this year thanks to the DNR and its partners.

The new regulations came out right after my last email, where I first suggested asking for an Executive Order. As I wrote then, "Will this fix the situation at Mille Lacs?

The more emails the President gets only helps our cause. Add your own thoughts to make it personal. We ask that you sign an Executive Order to honor the Treaty's original intent and address the technical flaw in the Presidential Order regarding the Treaty's tribal harvest rights.

Here are some reasons to ask for an Executive Order. Adding the whole list below is too large to fit size limits for the Contact the President email. Dayton has publicly stated that "I believe that all hunting and fishing in Minnesota should be done under the same rules";. Supreme Court's ruling on the existence of treaty harvest rights was based on its determination that President Zachary Taylor's revocation order was technically flawed;.

We even sued the State of Minnesota. It all fell on deaf ears! Let us start at the top—with a new Presidential Order! We must all abide by the same laws. I ask you to take a few minutes and go to perm. On the left of the screen there is a link for contacting President Trump. Click on it and within a few seconds you can send our President your own personal message.

Ask him to sign an Executive Order to replace the technically flawed according to the Supreme Court ruling Presidential Order signed by President Taylor in that ended harvest rights under the Treaty with the Chippewa Tribe. We are all citizens of America subject to the same rights and rules. Will this correct the present situation at Mille Lacs? But we have tried so many things over the years.

Whether you voted for Trump or not is really not relevant. If he chooses to help, we will ALL benefit. We won't share your email addresses. Make Mille Lacs Great Again! Pereira pointed out that negotiations with the tribes weren't going very well because they are mad about non-tribal anglers going over our quota. We must remember that regulations were catch and release only, so quotas are made-up hooking mortality numbers.

Pereira admitted that the issues are political and not being made with biology as the determining factor. My question would be "will regs be a kiss and make up year"? The DNR pointed out that there is a spike in angler activity in the last few weeks of July, which boosts hooking mortality. But this is discounted by most people on the Committee as they are on the lake daily and don't see enough boats. For example, one Committee member who sells live bait said that the day after the 4th of July weekend his sales of live bait dropped like a box of rocks.

So where does the DNR get these numbers? Governor Mark Dayton ordered stocking in Mille Lacs last year. But the DNR team last night admitted it is only being used for research data and not to add fish to the lake.

I sit there representing PERM as an observer wondering how these resorters and other business people are going to make it. Their deep-rooted livelihoods are at stake. So many of these people have become good friends and it pains me to see this happening to them in the name of politics.

Is this the end of the story? The Treaty is now being disputed in the Crow Wing County court. If history holds true, some federal judge will give the White Earth tribe the same harvest rights as Mille Lacs tribe has. The map of treaty area is at perm. Now is the time to stand up for the Mille Lacs area and the state of Minnesota.

Tribal co-management is not working. But it looks like the tail is wagging the dog. Please take the time to share this email. Mille Lacs advisory committee meets Feb. He stated that it is "no surprise that angler numbers and hours fell to all-time lows" after facing a super-low walleye quota, no keeping, and a night-fishing ban. This "maximum conservation" still wasn't enough he according to Fellegy. Fellegy found even bigger news.

He "heard no anti-Indian comments from members. Edwards was rarely present and faced no flak. Fellegy defended MLFAC's describing the gillnetting of game fish, especially during the spawn, as culturally "offensive to most Minnesotans. This travesty will result in 38 animals killed. Justification for the hunts has generally been, "It won't biologically threaten the moose herd.

Minnesota is a fair and open society based on freedom and equality, right? According to the U. Census, American Indians account for 1. So shouldn't they be allowed just 1. This year, the bands should have been allowed to kill just one moose and the remaining 37 should have gone to the other Until things change, any freedom -and moose- loving Minnesotans who spend their money at the Black Bear, Fond-Du-Luth, Fortune Bay and Grand Portage casinos need to have their heads examined!

October 19, A three-year hunting reprieve for Minnesota's struggling moose population has come to an end this fall. Shooting of 38 bulls by three Chippewa Indian tribes is planned. Twenty-five of those moose already have been killed by members of the Fond du Lac Band. The DNR urged the Band not to authorize a moose hunt, but the tribe chose to exercise its sovereign hunting and fishing rights. The targeting of moose in ends a three-year period when state and tribal game managers stopped moose hunting in the face of an alarming population decline.

From a peak of 8, moose surveyed in , the DNR now estimates the population to be under 4, animals. Now the cultural importance of a subsistence moose hunt overrides public sensitivities.

He had questions about state leadership, as did Joe Fellegy. Reversal of the walleye season extension came, in turn, after strong pushback by the Mille Lacs band. Their response included the possibility of lawsuits. What about all the anglers, resort owners, and taxpayers being a little bit displeased? Dayton took credit for keeping the walleye season open through Labor Day, after which fishing pressure and hooking mortality slows down.

Unfortunately, Dayton could take all the credit since the Mille Lacs Fishery Advisory Committee only knew about the closure when it was announced at their last meeting. Walleye fishing on Mille Lacs to close September 6. This reversal comes shortly after Governor Dayton reversed the DNR's closure that was tied to hooking mortality reaching surpassing the walleye harvest quota.

Wonder if the Governor is actually calling the shots. Or is he bowing to behind-the-scenes pressure beyond the DNR? And keep checking back here at perm.

Mille Lacs Walleye season remains open! Fishery Advisory Committee points the way. St Paul August 10, Governor Dayton has announced that the Mille Lacs walleye fishery will remain open even though the harvest quota has been reached for the season. He said closure "would devastate area businesses and communities.

DNR reps at Committee meetings initially rejected looking at "socio-economic factors" in making resource management plans. Later it was pointed out that the Committee's charge included their consideration. That's important because looking at economic loss in the Mille Lacs community wasn't considered a part of "co-management. That's not the whole picture. This year the entire harvest was from "hooking mortality. For example, do all boats on Mille Lacs get included in scoring hooking mortality?

DNR counts the number of boats times a predetermined number of fish per boat. Many anglers on Mille Lacs are targeting Muskies and Bass! Not every trailer on shore belongs to an angler. Some are pleasure boats. But this formula would have meant the end of walleye fishing for the season if not for Gov. Will socio-economic factors be part of co-management going forward? Even the DNR's latest press release mentions taking "socio-economic factors into consideration" and preventing "significant economic loss in the Mille Lacs community.

We must remember that ultimately the State of MN is responsible for ALL natural resources within the state's boundary. These MUST be managed for all citizens. Off-reservation non-Mille Lacs tribal walleye harvest mostly light.

August 6, -- Reduced walleye harvest on Mille Lacs had bands in the Treaty ceded territory moving walleye harvest activity to other lakes. Last winter, the bands declared their intentions to exercise their off-reservation treaty harvest rights on 73 lakes. Only 10 of these lakes saw any harvest activity, either netting or spearing. All fish are counted by tribal officials. Non-tribal harvest is assumed to be under the quotas. Tribal anglers must get a permit each day they fish. They must declare which lake they wish to fish that day.

Access is from designated boat landings that have monitoring. Spearers are limited to fish under 20 inches, with one between 20 and 24 inches, and one of any size.

The ceded area includes Mille Lacs! Discussion at the July meeting will include updates on the ongoing hooking mortality study, and the open water creel results thus far. The advisory committee of citizens has been active since October To sign up to receive these email updates, click on "Newsletter" on the left menu and enter your email in the blue box on the page.

Lake Mille Lacs stocking deserves history lesson. The adage, "What goes around comes around," can certainly be applied to the recent, last-ditch effort by the DNR--that of stocking walleyes in Lake Mille Lacs. The culture of anti-stocking of walleyes began in , beginning with the no cross-watershed--"keep the walleye genome pure"--dogma. After , the DNR's anti-stocking culture and its "new stocking policy" unnecessarily left un-harvested walleyes to die in rearing ponds because I, as an employee, couldn't exceed the stocking quota.

Modeling fish populations in the office is fun, but not reality. The people of Minnesota own the fish, not the DNR. Therefore, fisheries specialists need to leave their world of virtual fish management and better engage the public on their turf--but not at choreographed public meetings.

The true mission of the DNR is: For 25 years an agreement between the County and the Band allowed for joint law enforcement without having to address disputed boundaries. Now the Mille Lacs Band's revival of the dispute over the existence of a 61,acre reservation "made it clear that tribal government prioritized tribal law over and above Minnesota law and its cooperative relationship with Mille Lacs County.

The Tribal Police Department will continue to exist, but will no longer have the powers of a state law enforcement agency in the disputed territory unless a new cooperative agreement is reached. The County believes the reservation was disestablished and replaced with trust land. The band believes the reservation still exists and covers the entire 61, acres.

Many citizens with no affiliation to the Mille Lacs Band own property and live within this area. If the old reservation could be shown to still exist, the Mille Lacs Band would likely assert jurisdiction over all of the reservation, including non-Band members.

Sheriff Lindgren also stands "ready to put together a new cooperative agreement that respects that compromise" of the one just revoked. Conflicts evident at Fisheries Advisory Committee meeting, discussion with tribes productive. One of the biggest issues was the request of committee members that there would not be another economically devastating closure of the walleye season.

The DNR maintains that their data indicates a drastic decline in the vitality of the walleye population, with a lack of walleye of spawning age. Disagreement about the state of the fishery remained unresolved. Another issue was over the Committee also considering social and economic impact of the walleye crisis or just focusing on the walleye population issue alone. If the committee focuses just on the walleye, then it's merely a "partial" tackling of the program that overlooks the social and economic consequences, according to Eno.

DNR facilitator Katie Clower quickly apologized and the discussion returned to the agenda. Jamie Edwards of the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe also expressed hope for a "less divisive approach" going forward. Kayser described the face-to-face interaction with biologists from Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission as a breakthrough for the committee.

This helped offset months of Committee members criticizing the tribal approach to fishing on Mille Lacs walleye. GLIFWC is a consortium between tribal governments that manages resources off-reservation lands on which the tribes have gathering rights. The commission does not have the authority to dictate what the tribes themselves do.

Each tribe's DNR-style agency manages reservation resources independently. Also productive was learning that monitoring is primarily a tribal responsibility.

A tribal warden and creel data team is present at all times during tribal fishing activity and every fish harvested is counted. Tribal counts are themselves sometimes subject to double-checks from observers sent by the DNR. He agrees that hooking mortality plays a role in walleye sport fisheries. Modern angling trends encourage more release and more interest in mortality and survival of released fish.

Fellegy covered a lot of research that has been done on hooking mortality. Then he adds that mortality is almost never a player in lake management decisions impacting local fishing-related economies. Fellegy questions why a shutdown would even be considered, when there is no allowed harvest and an all-time-low fishing effort.

The DNR also greatly expanded its list of creel survey topics, spreading response data over a large number of categories. Capitol Rally to raise awareness about Mille Lacs issues stays positive May 5, Rob Drieslein commented on a rally in front of the state Capitol over Mille Lacs issues last Saturday.

The Hunting and Angling Club held the event to denounce the catch-and-release fishing regs for Lake Mille Lace, as well as raise awareness about commercial gill netting that could come to the Ceded Territory. Drieslei's follow up on the rally included an interview with Douglas Meyenburg, president of Proper Economic Resource Management. In making a connection to the rally, he noted that PERM has raised money for the landowner litigants in the Treaty case and remained active in monitoring and publicizing tribal natural resources treaty rights claims.

Yes, Meyenburg would've liked to have seen more people attend the rally. But Meyenburg admitted that "some people are so used to mediocrity and mismanagement of Mille Lace that they throw their hands up because they feel like there's nothing they can do.

It's still the place to be. Mille Lacs is 75 minutes from his home and he's fished there for decades. About 10 years ago he became PERM president because "the lake has been managed for political reasons for too long, and that's why I want to stay in this fight.

I suspect the people in Meyenburg's fishing party will have a good time on May Curran Lake Update April 13, After about 6 hrs of mediation yesterday with the DNR, reps from the Attorney General office, and landowners, the DNR has agreed to install and maintain a weir dam at the lake's outlet, which had been dredged to the point of draining the whole lake.

The landowners were given an award which they called a slap in the face, but they didn't want to pursue a costly lawsuit. The dam will be installed by and will allow Curran Lake to slowly recover it's historical high water mark and, hopefully, return to the fishing and duck hunting destination it once was. I will start some educational posts, some that will include my opinion of course and some clear facts as well.

Here is 1 - Mille lacs is NOT void of walleyes. Best guesstimates DNR would put the total poundage of mature and young walleyes around 2 million pounds. I and others believe this estimate is low due to sampling errors. The harvest this year is 40k pounds total. I would say that is very conservative. Any questions or topics any of you would like me to cover feel free to ask on this post or message me. Pushback on Mille Lacs live bait ban April 3, Some Committee members are also pushing back for another reason.

They never had a chance to weigh in on the possibility of a no-live-bait solution! They learned that artificial bait is used more these days than when their hooking mortality formula was first designed. And that mortality is reduced with artificial bait. But the DNR did not bring up the possibility of a catch-and-release season coupled with only artificial bait.

The "Advisory" Committee never had a chance to discuss it. See also comment to this post March 25, Dennis Anderson came out with a few overlooked facts about the treaty harvest arrangement under a Supreme Court ruling.

He makes a case for Mille Lacs fishery co-management discussions being public. Centerpiece of the lawsuit was Mille Lacs, the state's premiere walleye angling destination. Also at stake was Mille Lac's multimillion-dollar tourism economy. Plus a harvest of 24, pounds of walleye annually. The Minnesota Legislature turned it down, reviving the lawsuit that was decided in the Chippewa's favor by the Supreme Court in Anderson's key overlooked fact is that while the rejected proposed settlement might look good compared to the present situation, it only included the Mille Lacs band.

If the legislature had accepted it, they would have had to negotiate similar agreements with seven more tribes, who were parties to the Treaty. Today the DNR is forced to come up with ever more drastic quota schemes—the latest being no walleyes kept and no live bait—to accommodate treaty harvest rights. Anderson figures the DNR and tribes have found ways to work together. But private negotiations, behind-the scenes stance of the tribes, and current situation with Mille Lacs fishery and economy, all combine to leave Minnesota "a state divided on Lake Mille Lacs.

Anderson doesn't see that changing until co-management occurs in public "for all to see. But tribal harvest could be on all contiguous waters, allowing gillnets throughout the lake. Many acres of land that were included in the deal had homes and businesses on them, which would require Minnesota to get clear title on all of them before any land transfer.

The Chippewa, including the Mille Lacs Band, accepted payments from the Indian Claims Commission in and to settle these claims with the Federal government once and forever! When the media or the DNR talks about a "low" population of walleyes in Mille lacs, they do not include the estimated , walleyes of the year class, weighing in at over , lbs.

Welcome to the whacky world of Treaty Fisheries Management! Chew on that one for awhile. This summer it's catch and release only for walleye anglers, who also must use artificial bait. And a season-long closure of night fishing is back for all but Muskie anglers. The DNR's new regs for walleye fishing on Mille Lacs were said to be "designed to protect the fish needed to rebuild Mille Lacs Lake's walleye population. Don Pereira, DNR fisheries chief said, "Not allowing harvest is a difficult decision but it provides our best option.

This year's safe walleye harvest quota remains at 40, pounds, 28, for state anglers, and 11, for tribal anglers. Yet even with zero harvest, hooking mortality is still a factor. The DNR expects many more smaller-sized fish to be caught, especially the year class, given the unusually hot bite this past winter. Unfortunately, "The possibility of closing Mille Lacs to walleye fishing is greater this year than it was last," according to Pereira.

The DNR is being particularly cautious with the year class, which they are counting on to rebuild Mille Lacs' walleye population. These new regs are driven by "co-management" politics as much as by lake biology concerns. They threaten the livelihood of many businesses on and around Mille Lacs. It's one more reason why we must push for having the DNR go through the legislature when making such major changes.

Charges have been filed in Crow Wing County against four tribal members given citations for gill netting and wild rice violations on and near Gull Lake. Remember, the problems with Mille Lacs started with an illegal tribal harvest and citation in the Mille Lacs area. Violators and their supporters in Crow Wing County have been very open about creating a lawsuit to "affirm" harvest--and now property--rights for the entire territory ceded by the Treaty. Can you imagine enduring what we have experienced as "co-management" over so many lakes and so much territory?

Walleye --Catch and release only on Walleye. Smallmouth fish limit protected slot, 1 allowed over 21" in bag of 4. Northern Pike fish limit 30"" protected slot, 1 over 40" in bag of 5. The year class is now ranked second only to the one in the early 's. These fish will be starving if we don't have a HUGE perch hatch this spring.

There are also too many big fish in the system and they may be hungry as well. The DNR has told us that everything is on the table. Well, there will be a big pile on the table. My intention is to tear into Treaty Fisheries Management and make it stand on its own as a successful management style. If it doesn't, and I know it won't, we can advise to explore a new approach to Mille Lacs. Lawmaker will seek to override Mille Lacs walleye rules March 22, Instead, he wants a two-fish limit and live bait.

Leech Lake tribe members in Treaty rights lawsuit over killing deer out of season, on private land. Two Leech Lake tribe members facing illegal deer hunting charges asked the Beltrami County District Court to dismiss their case last Friday.

They claimed the state has no jurisdiction to charge them over hunting violations. They shot the deer from their car, and then followed the wounded deer onto private land, where they gutted it and dragged it back to the road. The men were confronted by the landowner, after which they left the deer and fled. DNR officers later located Morris and Finn, and the two men confessed to killing a deer out of season, on private land.

Tribal attorney Frank Bibeau argued that the case should be dismissed, claiming an Treaty gave tribal members the right to hunt, fish and gather across most of northern Minnesota.

The case is similar to one in which four Ojibwe tribe members were charged almost a year ago with illegally gathering wild rice without a permit and setting gill nets. While that case is considered to be the first step in a court battle to clarify tribal land use rights, Morris and Finn's case, would not be part of it, according to Bibeau. Expect more incidents of illegal harvest as a narrative is built to show that harvest--and soon to appear "land use" rights--have existed all along.

The Star Tribune's Tony Kennedy showed how DNR estimates of hooking mortality for walleyes is becoming a major source of frustration among resorters and related businesses on the lake. Resort owners are adamant about avoiding another shutdown, and they are speaking up at the Advisory Committee meetings.

They have questions about the model and data used to generate DNR estimations of hooking mortality. Recent experience shows why hooking mortality estimates has become a critical issue. Kennedy reported that in , 64 percent of the season's walleye allocation was reached via hooking mortality.

In , the breakdown of walleye deaths was 54 percent from hooking mortality. A major driver for the imbalance is the lake's stringent bag limit only one to inch walleye per angler in possession. Anglers' endless catch and release to get a keeper only drives up hooking mortality. And the potential for mid-season shutdown. The hot bite expected from the abundant year class walleyes none are keepers makes the hooking mortality that much worse.

Now, a growing contingent of Mille Lacs stakeholders is pressing for harvesting some of those fish. She explained how models were based on an assumption that all walleye were caught the same way.

They ignored different mortality outcomes between live and artificial bait. But then he says it's not entirely the DNR's fault. In the first of a two-part MilleLacsMessenger.

Top U.S. Stories